Victorious army problem
Now all this is mostly my own ideas, so I could be
wrong. But see what you think:
I think that one important cause of warfare, and of many other problems, is the problem of what to do with a victorious army, with an army which has won the war it was fighting. Actually if you win the war but lose most of the men, that solves the problem: what is hard is if you win the war and still have most of your army alive. Some of the men will be happy to just leave the army and go home to their farms and their wives or their families. But others, especially if the war has been a long one, may no longer have wives or families or farms to go back to, or they may not want to go back anymore. They've spent their whole lives fighting, and it's exciting and fun, and anyway it is what they know how to do, and they want to keep on doing it.
If you tell such men "Thanks, the war is over now, go on home," many of them will become criminals, outlaws, bandits, robbers. They will get into fights all over the place. They will beat people up and take their money. Some of them will become homeless beggars. It's a mess. After the Peloponnesian War in Greece, for example, this sort of thing was a big problem.
Another thing that can happen is that some of these men get together, form their own independent army, and try to take over the government in a civil war. The civil wars of the end of the Roman Republic may be related to this.
So you have to find some way of dealing with these men to keep this from happening. One way is just to keep on fighting until you do manage to get a lot of the men killed, or to find a way to lead them into someplace where they will get killed, or let them catch diseases or something. This may have been what Alexander did: he inherited a victorious army from his dad, and he used it to conquer West Asia. When even that failed to kill them off, he marched them across a desert, and lost three-quarters of his army, 75 000 men, in a matter of weeks. Either this is remarkably poor planning for a man who is known as a planning genius, or maybe he did it on purpose.
Or you can keep on paying them salaries even though they aren't fighting anymore. Augustus and later Roman Emperors did this. It keeps the soldiers quiet, but it is still very expensive for the taxpayers. The Islamic Empire did this as well, continuing to pay Arab soldiers out of tax money by taxing people who lived in the Islamic Empire but remained Christian, Jewish, or Zoroastrian in their beliefs.